Transparent, Resident-Obsessed Government
TOT-P1-C02-001Implementation mechanismExecutive Action

Henderson Doctrine / Strategic Priorities Framework

TOT-P1-C02-001

A public strategy every department answers to.

Delivery conditions

Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.

Mayoral executive authority; charter and labor boundaries apply.

The problem

City government drifts when nobody writes down what matters most. Departments optimize for their own metrics, budgets get divided by habit, and residents can't tell what the city is actually trying to accomplish.

The plan

The Henderson Doctrine publishes the administration's strategic priorities in plain language — the handful of outcomes the whole city government is pointed at. Every department aligns its plans, staffing, and budget requests to it.

The doctrine is public and measurable, so residents can hold the administration to its own stated priorities.

How you’ll know it’s working

  • Priorities published in plain language
  • Department plans aligned to the doctrine
  • Progress against doctrine priorities reported publicly

From the Blueprint

  • Organizes the Mayor’s agenda into five domains: Housing, Infrastructure, Public Safety, Economy, and Resident Experience & Innovation.
  • Every department receives a one-page Strategic Priorities Map within 90 days, updated quarterly; budgets sync to it.
  • Delivery teams get a single accountable Project Lead acting as micro-CEO with a budget envelope and public KPI dashboard.
  • AI through Technology & Innovation automates transcripts, task tracking, and performance reporting for each team.
  • Every team has an exit condition: when the mission ends it recommends scale it, improve it, or end it.
  • Escalations flow to the Chief of Staff for resolution within 72 hours.
Every promise becomes a project. Every project has an owner. Every owner is accountable — in public.
Sources and research conditions

S01 pp. 10-16; integrated; overlaps PDU/CDT chapters

SOURCE-SUPPORTED

Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.

Proposal FAQ

Questions, answered from the record.

What problem does Henderson Doctrine / Strategic Priorities Framework address?

City government drifts when nobody writes down what matters most. Departments optimize for their own metrics, budgets get divided by habit, and residents can't tell what the city is actually trying to accomplish.

What would Henderson Doctrine / Strategic Priorities Framework do?

The Henderson Doctrine publishes the administration's strategic priorities in plain language — the handful of outcomes the whole city government is pointed at. Every department aligns its plans, staffing, and budget requests to it. The doctrine is public and measurable, so residents can hold the administration to its own stated priorities.

Who would own Henderson Doctrine / Strategic Priorities Framework, and what authority would it use?

Chief of Staff / PDU. Executive Action: Mayoral executive authority; charter and labor boundaries apply.

How would Tampa know whether Henderson Doctrine / Strategic Priorities Framework is working?

Priorities published in plain language; Department plans aligned to the doctrine; Progress against doctrine priorities reported publicly

When would Henderson Doctrine / Strategic Priorities Framework move?

Year One: Scoped pilot with published stage labels, then evaluate before any scale decision.

Make this real

Fund the fight for Henderson Doctrine / Strategic Priorities Framework.

Help turn a published plan into organizing, outreach, and governing capacity.

Contribute on ActBlue →