Transparent, Resident-Obsessed Government
TOT-P1-C02-006Supporting programExecutive Action

Data Stewards / Integration Owners

TOT-P1-C02-006

Named owners for every dataset the city holds.

Delivery conditions

Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.

Departmental administrative authority; legal review and technical feasibility gated.

The problem

City data is a tangle of disconnected systems nobody fully owns. When data is wrong, missing, or locked in a vendor's black box, nobody can say who's responsible — and decisions get made on shaky numbers.

The plan

Every major city dataset gets a named data steward or integration owner — one accountable person for data quality, access, and integration with other systems. Stewards work with departments to open data safely and legally.

The program advances after legal review and technical feasibility checks, so integration never outruns privacy or security.

How you’ll know it’s working

  • Major datasets have published named stewards
  • Data-quality standards published
  • Integration owners documented for shared systems

From the Blueprint

  • Replaces informal ‘department liaisons’ with accountable Data Stewards / Integration Owners in every department.
  • Stewards own data meaning, quality, refresh cadence, and compliance readiness for their department’s feeds.
  • Each steward ensures semantic clarity: what a metric means, how it’s calculated, and how often it updates.
  • Operating split: T&I builds infrastructure and security, the Civic Insights Office governs KPIs and dashboards, programs use the tools.
  • Every major delivery team gets either an embedded Civic Insights analyst or a defined reporting funnel.
Integration owners, not intermediaries.
Sources and research conditions

S01 pp. 41-42, 92-96

SOURCE-SUPPORTED; LEGAL REVIEW; TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.

Proposal FAQ

Questions, answered from the record.

What problem does Data Stewards / Integration Owners address?

City data is a tangle of disconnected systems nobody fully owns. When data is wrong, missing, or locked in a vendor's black box, nobody can say who's responsible — and decisions get made on shaky numbers.

What would Data Stewards / Integration Owners do?

Every major city dataset gets a named data steward or integration owner — one accountable person for data quality, access, and integration with other systems. Stewards work with departments to open data safely and legally. The program advances after legal review and technical feasibility checks, so integration never outruns privacy or security.

Who would own Data Stewards / Integration Owners, and what authority would it use?

Office of Civic Insights. Executive Action: Departmental administrative authority; legal review and technical feasibility gated.

How would Tampa know whether Data Stewards / Integration Owners is working?

Major datasets have published named stewards; Data-quality standards published; Integration owners documented for shared systems

When would Data Stewards / Integration Owners move?

Sequencing: Advances after its listed research/partner gates are satisfied.

Make this real

Fund the fight for Data Stewards / Integration Owners.

Help turn a published plan into organizing, outreach, and governing capacity.

Contribute on ActBlue →