Affordable, Thriving Communities
TOT-P5-C25-001Supporting programCouncil Vote

Under-Utilization Fees

TOT-P5-C25-001

Empty storefronts and lots can't sit idle forever.

Delivery conditions

Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.

A fee on under-utilized property requires Council action and legal review before anything is assessed.

The problem

Everyone knows the block with the vacant lot that's been fenced off for years, or the empty storefront collecting dust while rents rise. Underused property drags down neighborhoods and gives owners no reason to change.

The plan

Under-Utilization Fees give the city a tool to nudge idle property back into productive use: a fee structure for chronically under-utilized commercial and residential property, designed with legal review to be fair, defensible, and targeted at real vacancy — not working owners.

Revenue from the fee flows back into the neighborhoods it comes from, and no fee is assessed until the legal gates are cleared and Council acts.

How you’ll know it’s working

  • Legal review completed and published
  • Vacancy criteria defined with due-process protections
  • Eligible properties identified through public data
  • Revenue reinvested into originating neighborhoods

From the Blueprint

  • A parcel triggers assessment after 18 consecutive months below 50% of its Form-Based Code density or use potential.
  • The annual fee runs 1% to 5% of assessed land value, scaled by the utilization gap and duration, and escalates the longer land sits idle.
  • Year 1 targets 50 to 75 egregious parcels; years 2-3 expand to 200-300 parcels across former CRA districts.
  • Revenue is earmarked 60% to infrastructure and 40% to a modular housing reserve; appeals are limited to documented construction or active permits.
  • Days 0-90: draft the ordinance for Council introduction; months 1-6: finalize the FBC assessment methodology.
Sources and research conditions

S01 pp. 389-390

SOURCE-SUPPORTED; LEGAL REVIEW

Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.

Proposal FAQ

Questions, answered from the record.

What problem does Under-Utilization Fees address?

Everyone knows the block with the vacant lot that's been fenced off for years, or the empty storefront collecting dust while rents rise. Underused property drags down neighborhoods and gives owners no reason to change.

What would Under-Utilization Fees do?

Under-Utilization Fees give the city a tool to nudge idle property back into productive use: a fee structure for chronically under-utilized commercial and residential property, designed with legal review to be fair, defensible, and targeted at real vacancy — not working owners. Revenue from the fee flows back into the neighborhoods it comes from, and no fee is assessed until the legal gates are cleared and Council acts.

Who would own Under-Utilization Fees, and what authority would it use?

Finance / Treasury. Council Vote: A fee on under-utilized property requires Council action and legal review before anything is assessed.

How would Tampa know whether Under-Utilization Fees is working?

Legal review completed and published; Vacancy criteria defined with due-process protections; Eligible properties identified through public data; Revenue reinvested into originating neighborhoods

When would Under-Utilization Fees move?

Sequencing: Advances after its listed research/partner gates are satisfied.

Make this real

Fund the fight for Under-Utilization Fees.

Help turn a published plan into organizing, outreach, and governing capacity.

Contribute on ActBlue →