Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.
Capital commitments and appropriations require Council action; the site-by-site strategy is sequenced behind the fiscal model and partner agreements.
The problem
Facility spending is usually decided in a bundle — a lump sum, a line item, nobody quite sure which building gets what or why. Residents deserve to know what each site costs, what it is for, and when the money actually shows up.
The plan
The Site-by-Site Capital Strategy plans every hub's investment individually: what the building needs, what it costs, what purpose it serves, and when funding arrives — sequenced behind the fiscal model so promises match resources.
Capital commitments go through Council as part of the portfolio's honest staging: no site funded before property, operator, and licensing are validated, and no site presented as delivered before the work is done.
How you’ll know it’s working
- A capital plan for each site: need, cost, purpose, and timing
- Promises matched to resources through the fiscal model
- No site funded before validation
- Council action on capital commitments tied to published staging
From the Blueprint
- Capital is phased: about $1.6M in year 1, starting with pilots and scaling only with data.
- Per-initiative costs: $1M for five wellness-hub retrofits, $150K for ten green sites, $200K for ten murals, $100K for modular pop-ups.
- Funding stacks CDBG and municipal bonds for retrofits, CDC and USDA grants for green space, art grants and sponsors for murals.
Sources and research conditions
Canonical corpus report, policy registry
SOURCE-SUPPORTED; FISCAL MODEL; PARTNER AGREEMENT
Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.