Seamless, Multimodal Transportation
TOT-P4-C20-006Supporting programExecutive Action

South Howard accountability case study

TOT-P4-C20-006

South Howard gets answers: a public accountability case study

Delivery conditions

Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.

Departmental engineering authority to conduct and publish the case study, with Council and regulatory dependencies for any capital response it recommends.

The problem

South Howard has flooded again and again, and residents there have every reason to be skeptical of new plans — they've lived through the promises and the standing water. Before asking anyone to trust the Flood Resilience Operating System, the administration should prove it works on the street that has suffered the most.

The plan

Run South Howard as a full public accountability case study: document the flooding history, diagnose the causes with verified data, apply the operating system's tools — baseline, scorecard, ranked projects — and publish every step.

Let South Howard be the proof point: if the system can earn trust there, it can earn it anywhere.

How you’ll know it’s working

  • Published flooding history and diagnosis for South Howard
  • Basin scorecard and ranked project list for the corridor
  • Capital projects delivered in sequence
  • Measured flood outcomes reported against the published baseline
Sources and research conditions

S04

SOURCE-SUPPORTED

Detailed schedule is not established in the supplied canonical timeline. Timing shown is v1 editorial sequencing, subject to the source gates.

Proposal FAQ

Questions, answered from the record.

What problem does South Howard accountability case study address?

South Howard has flooded again and again, and residents there have every reason to be skeptical of new plans — they've lived through the promises and the standing water. Before asking anyone to trust the Flood Resilience Operating System, the administration should prove it works on the street that has suffered the most.

What would South Howard accountability case study do?

Run South Howard as a full public accountability case study: document the flooding history, diagnose the causes with verified data, apply the operating system's tools — baseline, scorecard, ranked projects — and publish every step. Let South Howard be the proof point: if the system can earn trust there, it can earn it anywhere.

Who would own South Howard accountability case study, and what authority would it use?

Stormwater Engineering. Executive Action: Departmental engineering authority to conduct and publish the case study, with Council and regulatory dependencies for any capital response it recommends.

How would Tampa know whether South Howard accountability case study is working?

Published flooding history and diagnosis for South Howard; Basin scorecard and ranked project list for the corridor; Capital projects delivered in sequence; Measured flood outcomes reported against the published baseline

When would South Howard accountability case study move?

Year One: Scoped pilot with published stage labels, then evaluate before any scale decision.

Make this real

Fund the fight for South Howard accountability case study.

Help turn a published plan into organizing, outreach, and governing capacity.

Contribute on ActBlue →